• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

JP Cornerstone

Just another Cornerstone Accelerator site

  • JP Cornerstone
  • About
    • About JP Cornerstone
    • Code of Ethics
    • Professional Practice Guidelines
    • External Privacy Notice
  • Offices
    • Stockholm
    • Helsinki
    • Oslo
    • Copenhagen
  • Services
    • Executive Search
    • Board Search
    • Leadership Consulting
    • Interim Management
    • JPC Selection
  • News
  • Contact

Hiring Private Equity Leaders – Part III: Then the Challenge

October 21, 2020 by Cornerstone International Group Leave a Comment

Private equity hiring can bne a game of snakes and ladders

Third in a series by Steve Manning – Head of Financial Services / PE and Family Office Search Practice – Asia, Cornerstone Singapore

The bar is set high. Dynamics at Private Equity firms is fast, aggressive, all conquering, and as the investor leader you’re thrust into that all too familiar position of tackling senior leadership management issues at a newly acquired portfolio firm.

Part One and Two of this series looked at the essential and unique constituents of an ideal leadership candidate’s profile both in terms of hard and soft credentials.

Now we look at the challenge of finding a ‘pink giraffe’ to lead your portfolio invested company, why this is a difficult search, and surface compromise as an essential dynamic. The ideal of openness will be explored, and justification for a rationale of compromise; and how these impact the successful conclusion of senior executive hiring.

In Part Four we will later explore a balance between needs and compromises, and float tangential opportunity to expand horizons. We will also extricate ourselves from the myopia that accompanies the search for that elusive ‘pink giraffe’ management candidate.

1. Then There is the Challenge – Take a Look Into the Fight Ring.

At the start of this series, we examined the necessary hard and soft credentials and particularly unique requirements demanded from a portfolio company executive. There are two big fences to jump in order to secure that ‘pink giraffe”:  the pure credentials fit and the interest and motivation of a candidate to join your portfolio company.

Depth of talent in a newly acquired portfolio company often tends to be far from what was promised during deal negotiations. Key functional areas might have no leader, resources are limited, and perhaps there are too many non-performers who had ridden on the previous owner’s shirt tails.

CEOs have to quickly plug gaps, and deal with the impact of change. But who has had this change experience – other than a CEO with portfolio company experience?

CxO candidates might possess extensive credentials managing a multibillion dollar division, but when faced with a few hundred million dollar firm they may not fare well when required to ‘hands on’ manage most aspects of the business.

A large MNC divisional CxO could well have been surfing long term curves, and delivered only small incremental change — part of a bigger universe of decision making. Private equity, on the other hand, requires that they make decisions that will truly have a material impact on their business.

Coincidentally, these are good reasons why candidates might turn down what they’d see as a risky step in the first place. At the other end of the scale, a small enterprise leader’s depth of experience, even a tech founder, likely won’t measure up to the expectations of a private equity company with big growth designs.

Also, does the old asset-strip style and reputation still permeate people’s thinking of private equity? It’s uncertain, but without doubt the reputation of the industry still points towards a higher risk environment.

It is desirable to get these subjects out on the table from the onset. The right candidate will be interested in taking on a challenge and rewards through different motivators, and should not be fazed by such uncertainties.

Interest and motivation can be tested early in the search phase and agendas matched. The hiring team has to square with a candidate on what its expectations are, but a search firm can go deeper and evaluate responses to various scenario plays. Consultants can test a candidate’s response to how the role may play out, the personalities of the hirer, and how green the grass really is.

Challenges are clearly in abundance.

2. Making Concessions Without Compromise

When searching for your portfolio company executive, start with a true assessment of the challenge ahead. Make an honest evaluation of search parameters that will be out of bounds, and those that can be adjusted or compromised. This is not simply about eliminating the ‘like to have’ or ‘preferred’, it’s about how to open the search field, and compensate with other talent credentials to guarantee a timely, successful search and on-boarding.

  • First, Agree Where to Compromise

Sticking obstinately to a wants list with your search partner often wastes time and effort. An overly assertive hiring manager lays down the profile, culture and must-haves; a job description is shared and honed; and the search firm charges ahead having carefully understood all the written and spoken nuances for the role.

The search consultant may realise there will be a challenge, but regardless heads into the process without disclosing real concerns, or red flags from the onset.  There is sometimes a fear that by exhibiting anything less than effusive agreement they may lose the search mandate.

After two or three months have dragged by, the pink giraffe has not been found. There’s then typically a discussion about compromises such as  ‘does the  candidate have to come from this type of competitor’, or ‘do they have to have this level of seniority’.

This usually ends with ‘well, let’s open up the field to…’  And now your search consultant will have to revisit the potential list, or start again with a few new, or previously eliminated, parameters.

You want to short-circuit this painful scenario, and have a frank discussion at kick-off as to what might be viewed as overly inflated credentials or elements that were cut and pasted in without thought.

It is a known fact that searching for the portfolio company head is difficult.  It is not like the process required for regular hiring.  In the world of the private equity company, making concessions might require setting aside certain egos and bravado, but it is important to filter the wish list and give reality plenty of air.

  • Portfolio Company Experience

The quintessential first question on compromise will be this: whether or not to insist on past private equity portfolio company experience. Is it essential, or what compensating factors might there be? After you have looked at some core tenants for the role, certainly there is going to be a candidate demonstrating a huge capacity for building, transformation, adaptability, communication and resilience.

Facing a long and difficult search to find also specific, unique experience, square away with your search partner on the need for past portfolio experience from the outset. Avoid being obstinate just to trawl vainly for the elusive catch.

If a candidate doesn’t have a past portfolio company feather in his or her cap, look for personality attributes that indicate they will learn fast, and absorb this whole new world of Private Equity owned business.

You might also consider whether portfolio company experience in whatever position might not be a panacea in your own company. A unique type of business, for instance, may prioritise specific product/service knowledge over a portfolio company background – think tech firms playing a new game.

With or without portfolio company experience, a candidate must demonstrate clear cognisance of private equity company investment and divestment decision making; the dynamics of turning a strategy into practice; and how to interface between employees, private equity company management, and boards. They must understand how this clock ticks, and how a private equity company looks at business in its entirety.

In a high stakes, high expectations, fast moving portfolio company environments, is it realistic to settle for a humble consensus leader whose character likely doesn’t match your stereotype?

As with any tangential candidate your assessment must place all traits on the scales. The final decision will be heavily influenced by personality compatibility with you and your private equity company management team.

Part Four will identify means to extricate from a fixed mind-set, to think tangentially, and bring a search to a successful conclusion.

Filed Under: Cornerstone Blog

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Leadership Academy: In Your Corner- Emotional Intelligence: An Important Leadership Skill for 2023 and Beyond
  • The Cornerstone Eagle – December 2022 – Pause, Reflect, Learn and Take Action.
  • Making Certain Your Organization is Resilient  
  • Leadership Academy: In Your Corner- GRIT
  • Leadership Academy: In Your Corner- Uncertainty: The Times They Are A-Changin’

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • February 2018
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • July 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • October 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • October 2014
    • June 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • December 2013
    • August 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • July 2011
    • May 2011
    • March 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • June 2007
    • April 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002

    Categories

    • Cornerstone Blog
    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2023 · JP Cornerstone · Sitemap

    Website Development by LimeCuda