• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

JP Cornerstone

Just another Cornerstone Accelerator site

  • JP Cornerstone
  • About
    • About JP Cornerstone
    • Code of Ethics
    • Professional Practice Guidelines
    • External Privacy Notice
  • Offices
    • Stockholm
    • Helsinki
    • Oslo
    • Copenhagen
  • Services
    • Executive Search
    • Board Search
    • Leadership Consulting
    • Interim Management
    • JPC Selection
  • Insights
  • News
  • Contact

Archives for February 2019

China Steps Up Control of Pharma Market

February 28, 2019 by Cornerstone International Group Leave a Comment

2019 is now really starting in China, with the beginning of the Year of the Pig. Everybody in the China pharma market is focusing on how the new central purchasing pilot will be deployed in the coming months.

At first glance it looks familiar, with convergence with known international practices: strengthening of bidding rules, phasing out of off-patent products, shortening of supply chain etc. Some see the changes as an “extension” of the older bidding system which is aggregating a number of regions (the name of the campaign is misleading: “7 provinces plus 4 cities”). The key is not here. In fact, deep price cuts are expected for a committed volume of products. It is a change of paradigm.

Reshaping Admin

In a typical way, the Authorities have started by reshaping the administrative structure in 2018 with a new leadership and reaching higher in the political hierarchy. Decision-making goes up to the Prime Minister.

At operational level, a new organization is also in place in order to integrate the whole “drug policy”. The new administration integrates medical insurance and pricing under one roof and is managed by a former vice minister of Finance. Even more important, they have decided a new approach (silu): “combination of market and plan”. The products delivered at hospital and reimbursed are considered now as under the direct management of the State and its plan. They have started with oncology which has imported products and the most expensive.

Volume Commitments

There will be commitment of volume purchased by the hospitals. It is the first time that this would be done at the level of province and above. The question will be the quality of the forecast and its consequences.

What will happen when numbers are not met? How to ensure supply if forecast is too low? How to compensate companies if price has been slashed but volume is not reached? How will the Authorities ensure that hospitals strictly implement the policy? There is currently a lot of contradictory news, such as whether the hospitals would keep the right to have a second round of negotiation procurement when they are grouped together.

More than a tendering system

The vision behind this scheme is far more than a new tendering system. It is in fact an integrated way to manage the use and supply of drugs in hospitals. The State is increasing control within the hospitals.

The new system is not limited to purchasing, but also includes prescription and operations in general. Directors of hospitals are no longer the highest authority in the hospitals and final decision-making is done by the Party Secretary.  Often, he or she is a former Director and knows his business, but the nature of the decision making within hospitals is changing and reverting to the past.

The behavior of doctors is also more controlled with guidelines that dictate the prescription of purchased products for at least 70% of their activity. The implementation will be strongly facilitated by the remarkable IT infrastructure developed in China in recent years.

Bottom line. We can foresee three major consequences if the current policies are fully implemented.

1. Impact on Patient Choice

First and most important, patient choice is at stake. Recently, the Authorities have very rightfully standardized procedures, bringing much needed rationalization. This work is not yet finished. But at same time the clinical reality should prevail, and Patients and Doctors need alternative therapeutic solutions. They should be given the choice to adapt their clinical strategy.

2. New Business Models

All companies will need to adjust their business model and P&L to a lower margin. Will international manufacturers still be able to promote innovation in big way? Will local manufacturers be able to raise quality if they have no incentive to do so? The slow-down of the Generic Quality Consistency Evaluation program has disappointed numerous local companies. Distributors too will have to make choices and focus on short-string supply or promote on behalf of the manufacturer.

Maybe most worrying, local start-ups are seeing their business plan and assumptions collapsing. Recent IPOs are almost all trading below their introductory price, in part because there was a bubble but also because investors now understand that pricing assumptions for new products are being slashed. Innovation – both local and international — requires reward.

One consequence of the impact on business models will be a reduction in the number of Medical Representatives employed for primary care products. This will limit the valuable education work that takes place on how to use primary care drugs to maximize healthcare outcomes and improve Chinese Patient Health.

Medical Representatives are major actors in organizing medical education events to share best practices among the healthcare community, creating educational bridges between tier 2/1 hospitals and tier 3 or even county hospital. Reducing their presence might go against one of the goals of the government to improve healthcare across all the hospitals.

3. Access to Talent

Finally, from the talent angle, we see that Market Access has now become the core requirement critical to navigating the policies at both the national level but also at the hospital level to follow detailed deployment. Demand is huge for talent in quality (address the challenges of the new policies and more sophisticated requirements) and at same time in quantity as access is needed at each province/city/hospital level. It is another hot recruitment and development area!

Filed Under: Cornerstone Blog

Leadership Capacity Means Learning to Delegate

February 20, 2019 by Cornerstone International Group Leave a Comment

I define Leadership Capacity as the ability to lead more effectively and more efficiently at higher levels of organizational complexity.

That definition assumes that a team member already is leading effectively and efficiently at their current level. The ongoing research in leadership development documents that a leader can continue to enrich, enhance, and expand leadership capacity.

Delegation is one critical pathway to maximize capacity

Delegation is a learned competency answering the who, what, when, and how interrogatives. Leaders have three options: (1) Not delegating, (2) Delegating prematurely, or (3) Delegating developmentally

There are three myths surrounding the first option.  Leaders do not delegate because they tell themselves:

“I need control.”

“I can do it faster.”

“It takes too long to train someone else.”

 

In reality, none are valid.  Leaders who maintain full control of the details in operational work processes make three long-term mistakes:

  1. They become the bottleneck to productivity.

Leaders who assume they can do it faster (or better) miss the perspective of the “Future Productivity Potential” (FPP) from other team members who learn the skills needed for new assignments. The result is more people who can produce more work.

  1. They hinder the development of emerging leaders.

Not delegating leads to confusion and frustration when team members are given full responsibility but not full authority. The application of new learning in stretch assignments is what contributes to new competencies and greater capacity. Organizations that value development and delegation are solving the attraction, retention, and engagement issues faced by others.

  1. They keep themselves busy in operations.

They shy away from the lonely journey to the 30,000-foot perspective needed for strategic leadership.   When they do, no-one else has the assignment

 

The Delegation Matrix

Delegation is not only learned but it is a process of moving a team member from low responsibility and low authority to high responsibility and high authority.

Leadership Debrief

What operational tasks are you hanging onto that someone else could do? Why?

What operational tasks keep you from the strategic leadership needed for greater effectiveness and efficiency at higher levels of organizational complexity?

Identify one task you could delegate and identify the team member you will invest in to the point of full responsibility and full authority. How about now?

 

Filed Under: Cornerstone Blog

Executive Search: Get it Right the First Time

February 12, 2019 by Cornerstone International Group Leave a Comment

There is a statistic that sees a lot of use in the executive search business: “40% of executives hired outside fail in the first 18 months.” The number varies. I’ve seen it as high as 64%. Whatever it ends up at, the message is that installing a new leader – we’re talking C-level here – is a very fraught business.

Replacing a leader is a costly process. Not getting it right – watching all that time and money walk out of the door prematurely – is brutally expensive. Estimates vary between multiples of thousands and millions. When CEO John Walter left AT&T after less than a year, he took with him $25M. It took $100M and a shareholder lawsuit for Disney to get rid of Michael Ovitz after 454 days.

Most of the time, this “fail ratio” is cited in defense of “onboarding”, the practice of assigning a coaching program to help the newcomer adapt and begin contributing to the bottom line as quickly as possible.

Makes sense. Most of the members of Cornerstone International Group around the world offer onboarding with a high-level executive search program.

Discounting the token onboarding – “here’s your computer and the coffee’s down the hall” – job-specific coaching is shown to slash the risk of failure. Our colleagues at PrimeGenesis, an onboarding specialist firm, claim reductions from 40% failure at 18 months to 5% or less. So, as an insurance policy, it’s a good buy.

Do it right, not over

But there is another way. As a wise old carpenter once told me, do it right, not over. In other words, take extra care and effort to get the right person to start with. And this is where the headhunting business sharply divides between the drive-by “contingent searchers” and the “retained executive search” community.

If you are unsure of the difference, download our e-book “Retained or Contingency?” Reader’s Digest version: Contingency works for lower-level hires; Retained is essential for executive hires.

This an effect of process. The contingency searcher seeks out anyone who is qualified. The retained searcher only wants the one person who is the best qualified. The time spent by each on your behalf is proportionately different.

Pareto’s rule reversed

Larry Shoemaker, the President of Cornerstone International Group, made the key point in a previous comment on the Pareto Principle, or the 80/20 rule.

The old recruiting model, he wrote, depended 80% on finding the right candidates, and 20% on everything else.

Today, it takes only 20% of the time to find well qualified people. It takes the other 80% to determine which one will be successful in the future in the specific organization relative to its culture, strategy and purpose.

Qualifying an incoming leader is an intricate process unique to the hiring organization. Education, skill sets and experience are reduced to table stakes. Cultural fit has been shown to be biggest single factor in determining the contribution of a new executive

In the next post, we’ll look at ways of making this critical assessment.

Filed Under: Cornerstone Blog

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Attracting Leadership Talent in a Private Company
  • It’s early in 2025 – what has changed?
  • Thriving in an Era of Continual Business Reinvention
  • Managing Multigenerational Workplaces Across Cultures – Part 2
  • Managing Multigenerational Workplaces Across Cultures

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • December 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • January 2024
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • May 2023
    • March 2023
    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • August 2022
    • July 2022
    • June 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • November 2021
    • October 2021
    • September 2021
    • August 2021
    • July 2021
    • June 2021
    • May 2021
    • April 2021
    • March 2021
    • February 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • November 2020
    • October 2020
    • September 2020
    • August 2020
    • July 2020
    • June 2020
    • May 2020
    • April 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • May 2019
    • April 2019
    • March 2019
    • February 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • June 2018
    • May 2018
    • February 2018
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • July 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • October 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • October 2014
    • June 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • December 2013
    • August 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • July 2011
    • May 2011
    • March 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • August 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • June 2007
    • April 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • August 2005
    • July 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002

    Categories

    • Cornerstone Blog
    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.org

    Copyright © 2025 · JP Cornerstone · Sitemap

    Website Development by LimeCuda